J.L.A. van Vugt, S. Levolger, R.W.F. de Bruin, J. van Rosmalen, H.J. Metselaar, J.N.M Ijzermans
Chair(s): prof. dr. Herold Metselaar, MDL-arts, Erasmus MC Rotterdam
Thursday 10 march 2016
12:30 - 13:00h
at Foyer
Categories: Postersessie
Parallel session: Postersessies XI - Opgesplitst in 3 tijdblokken en 3 categoriëen (klinisch, basaal, donatie)
Background and aims:
Although liver transplant outcome has improved significantly, the shortage of human organs remains prevalent. Therefore, strict patient selection is of paramount importance. Recently, low CT-assessed skeletal muscle mass was identified as a novel prognostic parameter to predict outcome in liver transplant candidates. Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between CT-assessed muscle mass and outcome in liver transplant candidates.
Methods:
A systematic search was performed according to the PRISMA-guidelines. Eligibility and quality assessment, and data-extraction were performed in duplicate. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models. Results: In total, 19 studies, including 3803 partly overlapping patients (65% male, mean age 52-62), fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Main indications for transplantation were viral infections, followed by alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Median MELD-score ranged from 9-21, albumin level 2.8-3.4 g/dl, and BMI 24.0-29.4 kg/m². Nine studies reported the cross-sectional muscle area (CSA, cm²) with corresponding skeletal muscle index (SMI; CSA corrected for height, cm²/m²), whereas the psoas area (PA) and dorsal muscle group area were reported in nine and one study, respectively. Sarcopenia prevalence ranged from 20-70% and various (gender-specific) cut-off values were used. The pooled hazard ratio of sarcopenia for waiting list mortality was 1.75 (95% CI 1.02-3.01, p=0.04). However, this finding is of limited value due to a small number of studies. The pooled hazard ratios of sarcopenia and cross-sectional skeletal muscle mass (per incremental cm²/m²) for post-transplant mortality were 1.84 (95% CI 1.11-3.05, p=0.02) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-1.00, p=0.05), respectively, independent of MELD score. Due to substantial heterogeneity between reported outcome measures, no meta-analyses could be performed for short-term outcomes.
Conclusion:
Sarcopenia impairs outcome in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Limited evidence also suggests that sarcopenia is associated with waiting list mortality. Therefore, skeletal muscle mass assessment may contribute to pre-transplant risk assessment.